Still dark ruby-garnet colour, I was a little perturbed by
the bouquet. Greenish stemmy and funky
notes, no meat or horse thankfully, but not what was expected. Although 2000 wasn’t a super-ripe and hot
year in The Bay, the Bordeaux-styled reds haven’t appeared unripe, with the
likes of Te Mata Estate saying that 2000 was a classic for them, with elegance
being their preferred style, the 2000 ‘Coleaine’ better than the monumental
1998.
Back to the Redmetal, still vigorous and juicy on palate,
with dark berry and herby fruits, some black earth and secondary flavours, all
backed by grunty extract and robust tannins and a flash of acidity. Sinewy in a big way, and still with another
decade of life ahead of it. I don’t
think it’ll evolve into finesse and layers, but it’ll drink well. The bottle was drained, in addition to a
number of others in the course of the night, and SWMBO, who can be critical of
brett, green and undrinkability was pretty happy with it. The WRXers beamed smiles as the supped up.
Hi. Not sure I agree with your (Te Mata's?) view of the 2000 v 1998 comparison in the Hawkes Bay. A 1998 Coleraine I have had in the last year was drinking very well. I had 1998 Cornerstone for a dinner with a 1996 Pontet Canet, and a number of the diners (and the French waiter and chef) preferred the former - ripe and vibrant but in no way monumental. For me, 2000 is a good but lesser HB vintage than 1998.
ReplyDeleteBest, Howard
Hi Howard - I'm with you in preferring 1998's ripeness. Te Mata like elegance, which 2000 delivers.
ReplyDelete