In these contemporary times we are seeing the popularity of ‘orange’
wines, made by skin contact, usually longer than is normal in ‘conventional’
vinification. One extracts greater
colour, usually orange, of course, but also there is increased phenolic
extraction, which heads towards the edge of acceptability in hardness and
bitterness. The best winemakers judge
this well, and the wines can be fabulous to drink, and they can be better wines
with food. But many can’t get the
balance and the wines can be horrible to drink, and sometimes harbour faults
from the minimal use of any intervention.
I’m introducing another subject here, altogether, but you get the point
of more extreme or ‘natural’ winemaking, I’m making.
We had a treat as delivered for dinner by Mo the Political
Gal this evening – a true ‘orange’ wine.
The 2001 Dirler Alsace Riesling ‘Belzbrunnen’
was a fully-aged and mature example. The
colour was deep orange with golden hues.
The bouquet was all about citrus (orange) fruit and mead like
honey. It had gone past the toast and kero
tertiary stage and showed complex hints of nuttiness, but no real oxidation. Then on palate, lusciously off-dry to
taste. The Mentor and SWMBO suggested
botrytis, but I didn’t find it musky. It
was fully-developed fruit flavours knife-edge between citrus and nuts. Beautifully soft, rounded and luscious, with no
drying out at all. The wine got richer
with time in the glass. A conventional
wine turned orange, and naturally over the course of time from bottle-age. Maybe this is the way to do it?
No comments:
Post a Comment