The wines all carried different names, all funky, as is the
rage right now. Three Shirazes first, a
2010 ‘Chocolate Factory’ McLaren Vale Shiraz, ripe and chocolatey with hints of
eucalypt and cedar. Good depth anD
concentrated too. Then a 2010 ‘Baron von
Nemesis’ Barossa Shiraz, very similar again, maybe a little more accessible,
but a bit bitter and reductive. And
moving to a 2010 ‘Lake Doctor’ Langhorne Creek Shiraz, touched by a little
Viognier, and consequently a little lighter and more mellow in mouthfeel, but
brighter in aromatic nature. All with
hints of chocolate, plums, cedar spice and eucalypt. Surely this consistency must be winemaker
signature, as the origins were differet?
Putting the issue further to the test, a 2010 ‘Avalon Tree’
Langhorne Creek Cabernet Sauvignon.
Clearly blackcurranty and leafy even, but in the glass, the tell-tale
spicy, cedary oaky and eucalypt signature came out. Then to an extreme, a 2010 ‘Violet
Beauregard; Clare Valley Malbec. All the
Christmas cake spices and dark plums taken to another far-away, exotic place. Bigger, blacker but there again, eucalypt,
liquorice, cedar and spices. Same
story. And finally, a 2011 ‘Canto di
Lago’ Langhorne Creek Sangiovese/Barbera.
Much lighter and less ripe – a function of the vintage? Certainly red cherries and softer red
fruits. In a reduced expression, the
same old story with spices, cedar, liquorice etc, etc, etc.
I concluded it must be winemaker after all these different
factors not changing the picture too much.
There’s a place for consistency and also for differentiation. I like the consistent good quality. But I could have drunk any of them for the
same effect and taste.
No comments:
Post a Comment